Pre-Roman London
This is a very poor argument for a pre-Roman London - it depends upon assertion - totally ignores archaeological evidence and basically the argument comes down to the assertion that Tacitus description of London as a famous centre of commerce is impossible if it was a town only 18 years old.
Nowhere does it even mention the fact that no archaeological evidence has been found for a pre-Roman City.
Pre-Roman London
Nowhere does it even mention the fact that no archaeological evidence has been found for a pre-Roman City.
Pre-Roman London
Comments